First, it is good to point out the fact that these NGOs have incontrovertibly played a crucial role in all the various attempts of color revolutions, successful or not, happened in the last few years, and methodologies used to foment discord in nations from within the political and social upheavals have seemed highly specular between them. The undisputed guru of these GMOs is certainly the U.S. tycoon George Soros, so-called "philanthropist" to advocate a model of "open society" ("Open Society") firmly anchored to the guidelines outlined at the time by the Austrian philosopher Karl Popper. In his magnum opus - "The Open Society and Its Enemies" - munch Popper distinguishes the various models of society according to their degree of "openness" and "openness" (Popper avoids recourse to the term "closure"), divided by a deep root, Schmitt mutual enmity. The "open society" is based on the central role of the individual and the fundamental connotations of which is a carrier, or rationality, discretion, atoms and the total lack of a teleological whole agenda of the individual. It follows that a society that fulfills these requirements in full all forms of waste assolutizzante entity, whichever it is, which puts in check the centrality of the individual and the characteristics associated with it. The degree of openness of a society is then given the breadth of the range the possibility that it is able to guarantee the free development of the individual, which in combination with all other atomistic individual is theoretically unlimited, totally meaningless and unrelated to the design and the achievement of any purpose group. Popper believes that the meeting of all the individual atoms would create a positive synergy, which arises from the fact that a substantial social balance weights and their weights. A model of society of which he becomes Popper, as expected, avid supporter and promoter. In contrast to this model advocated, Popper opposed to "hostile to open society", not closed, but most often defined as "totalitarian", which is built on a structure based on the individual but not on the absolute, whose quintessence made of rules, laws and infringes
tasks (even if the introduce such "absolute" freedom of choice is made for the individual) freedom coercively individual, and not subject to restrictions resulting from his will but by some outside institution. Once limited to the range of possibilities of realization of the individual, society loses the essential connotation of "openness" and would end up channeling every free individual development within specific circuits decided "from outside". Popper takes this
single aspect of society - the presence or absence of "openness" - as the supreme discriminating the first and only criterion for classification of each construct political, social, economic and philosophical. It follows that thinkers such as Plato (regarded as "obscurantism father), Georg Wilhelm Hegel, Karl Marx and Oswald Spengler end up being branded as" enemies of open society ", guilty of having introduced concepts ethical, political, sociological and cheap raw for the consumption of the individual, which do not recognize this imperative role demanded by the "open society". Right and left, progress or reaction are not recognized any weight in terms of distinguishing Popper, which flows into the cauldron of equiparante "enemies of open society" Marxists, Fascists and Socialists, and celebrates the 'opening' guaranteed by the artifices of philosophy architected as an anarchist - individualists reactionary to what Schopenhauer by extreme lighting as the Marquis De Sade. That based on the cult of the individual and its key features is certainly a doctrine simple, attractive and easily administered to the "masses" thing the Popperian George Soros is adamant. The hand of "philanthropist" in determining subversive dynamics that have shaken many countries - members of the former Soviet Union (Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia) and others (Lebanon, Iran, Myanmar) - has been recognized by virtue of their heavy role played in them by various social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter (maximum expression of individualism) and the mass media (a host of radio and television channels) just purchased directly from Non-Governmental Organizations ("George Soros' Open Society") or indirectly ("Freedom House ") due to the tycoon Goerge Soros, well aware of the fact that the media coverage of the company means to them within the insinuation of a mindset that" repetition "would amount to" proof ". Messages sent from these mass media are focusing just on the principles emphasized by Popper, in which individualism advocated extremist from morning to night does nothing but enhance the potential of the individual and foster a general nuisance to all that is the rule and rule, considered in its key Popper, mere constraints which prevent the free and full deployment of the individual will. These general guidelines have been taken by members of the mob sovversori NGOs and adapted to the specific time to time by the various countries that joined in the viewfinder. Countries where the tension caused by friction intestines linked to existing interests in open conflict between them has been exploited and properly "dressed" with clothes in a position to exercise great seduction so at some strata of the population concerned at what the so-called "international community" (composed, as usual, by the few usual suspects). In Iran it was the elusive electoral fraud and the alleged subordinate role cut out for the woman (case Sakineh in particular) to act as war horses, while in Georgia and Ukraine dissolution and authoritarianism (the usual "human rights" violations) of the ruling classes. In this way the various Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mikheil Saakashvili and Viktor Yushchenko could get the consensus needed at home and outside, to reverse - or groped to do - the situation in their favor. It 'something that can actually similar took place in Tunisia, with the revolution promptly renamed "Jasmine", and Egypt. And always behind the expected approval of George Soros. A true philanthropist. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment