Sports Artists Paintings

School


I just heard the president (of) with (s) Iglio rant school full of teachers who want to instill communist (this strange word from his lips, I would have seemed more familiar with c less) in the minds of children the principles contrary to those that their parents would like. Made me want to answer that parents who want a school to teach their kids the key revisionist history or who want to fill the pumpkin with superstitions, if they have to pay eccheccavolo.

I was reminded of a song also by Eugenio Finardi, "School", which we carry in some ways.


I wanted to know the true story of the people
how do you live and what do we really need
because the only thing the school should do to learn is to teach
.

I recommend you listen to everything, if you do not know.

Brazil Drivers License Template

Popperian

The vigorous flowering of social groupings, better known as NGOs is a central phenomenon of our time, whose understanding is able to provide quite useful tools to make some specific predictions about the near future and take the turn that events that shook much of the Arab and Persian.

First, it is good to point out the fact that these NGOs have incontrovertibly played a crucial role in all the various attempts of color revolutions, successful or not, happened in the last few years, and methodologies used to foment discord in nations from within the political and social upheavals have seemed highly specular between them. The undisputed guru of these GMOs is certainly the U.S. tycoon George Soros, so-called "philanthropist" to advocate a model of "open society" ("Open Society") firmly anchored to the guidelines outlined at the time by the Austrian philosopher Karl Popper. In his magnum opus - "The Open Society and Its Enemies" - munch Popper distinguishes the various models of society according to their degree of "openness" and "openness" (Popper avoids recourse to the term "closure"), divided by a deep root, Schmitt mutual enmity. The "open society" is based on the central role of the individual and the fundamental connotations of which is a carrier, or rationality, discretion, atoms and the total lack of a teleological whole agenda of the individual. It follows that a society that fulfills these requirements in full all forms of waste assolutizzante entity, whichever it is, which puts in check the centrality of the individual and the characteristics associated with it. The degree of openness of a society is then given the breadth of the range the possibility that it is able to guarantee the free development of the individual, which in combination with all other atomistic individual is theoretically unlimited, totally meaningless and unrelated to the design and the achievement of any purpose group. Popper believes that the meeting of all the individual atoms would create a positive synergy, which arises from the fact that a substantial social balance weights and their weights. A model of society of which he becomes Popper, as expected, avid supporter and promoter. In contrast to this model advocated, Popper opposed to "hostile to open society", not closed, but most often defined as "totalitarian", which is built on a structure based on the individual but not on the absolute, whose quintessence made of rules, laws and infringes

tasks (even if the introduce such "absolute" freedom of choice is made for the individual) freedom coercively individual, and not subject to restrictions resulting from his will but by some outside institution. Once limited to the range of possibilities of realization of the individual, society loses the essential connotation of "openness" and would end up channeling every free individual development within specific circuits decided "from outside". Popper takes this

single aspect of society - the presence or absence of "openness" - as the supreme discriminating the first and only criterion for classification of each construct political, social, economic and philosophical. It follows that thinkers such as Plato (regarded as "obscurantism father), Georg Wilhelm Hegel, Karl Marx and Oswald Spengler end up being branded as" enemies of open society ", guilty of having introduced concepts ethical, political, sociological and cheap raw for the consumption of the individual, which do not recognize this imperative role demanded by the "open society". Right and left, progress or reaction are not recognized any weight in terms of distinguishing Popper, which flows into the cauldron of equiparante "enemies of open society" Marxists, Fascists and Socialists, and celebrates the 'opening' guaranteed by the artifices of philosophy architected as an anarchist - individualists reactionary to what Schopenhauer by extreme lighting as the Marquis De Sade. That based on the cult of the individual and its key features is certainly a doctrine simple, attractive and easily administered to the "masses" thing the Popperian George Soros is adamant. The hand of "philanthropist" in determining subversive dynamics that have shaken many countries - members of the former Soviet Union (Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Georgia) and others (Lebanon, Iran, Myanmar) - has been recognized by virtue of their heavy role played in them by various social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter (maximum expression of individualism) and the mass media (a host of radio and television channels) just purchased directly from Non-Governmental Organizations ("George Soros' Open Society") or indirectly ("Freedom House ") due to the tycoon Goerge Soros, well aware of the fact that the media coverage of the company means to them within the insinuation of a mindset that" repetition "would amount to" proof ". Messages sent from these mass media are focusing just on the principles emphasized by Popper, in which individualism advocated extremist from morning to night does nothing but enhance the potential of the individual and foster a general nuisance to all that is the rule and rule, considered in its key Popper, mere constraints which prevent the free and full deployment of the individual will. These general guidelines have been taken by members of the mob sovversori NGOs and adapted to the specific time to time by the various countries that joined in the viewfinder. Countries where the tension caused by friction intestines linked to existing interests in open conflict between them has been exploited and properly "dressed" with clothes in a position to exercise great seduction so at some strata of the population concerned at what the so-called "international community" (composed, as usual, by the few usual suspects). In Iran it was the elusive electoral fraud and the alleged subordinate role cut out for the woman (case Sakineh in particular) to act as war horses, while in Georgia and Ukraine dissolution and authoritarianism (the usual "human rights" violations) of the ruling classes. In this way the various Mir Hossein Mousavi, Mikheil Saakashvili and Viktor Yushchenko could get the consensus needed at home and outside, to reverse - or groped to do - the situation in their favor. It 'something that can actually similar took place in Tunisia, with the revolution promptly renamed "Jasmine", and Egypt. And always behind the expected approval of George Soros. A true philanthropist. "

2003 Mini Copper Auto Transmission Noise

The bear comes to Etsy



Eventually I did. I opened my Etsy store ursino on , one of the sites most used by those who buy and sell handmade or vintage items on the Internet. I pondered over this decision for several months, encouraged by friends, pressed from the pile of items knit from looking at me sideways over the lid of the piano, encouraged by the balls in the boxes under the couch (knittaci, knittaci), held back by fear of failure, who knows what trouble you to combine, to fail.

The desire to change his life got to do, but not because I believe that such a move would allow me to leave work, rather than a turning point for me is the attitude in considering my options, a dive.

For those who want to visit me, a link and thanks!

What To Do When A Scorpio Man Is Mad At You

The obsession of borrowed Iranian

And then, as if by magic, the upheavals that have recently shaken the North African area overlooking the Mediterranean would have expanded like wildfire, reaching first the Levant and then the Middle East. At least that tells us the great international press, that with this latest "effort" brings to three attempts to foment discord in organized outside Iranian society which could lead to a real coup against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

the summer of 2009 took place in Iran a real color revolution, during which the mob tried to Pentagon strategists to slip through the cracks of existing tensions in the endogenous complex Iranian society to pave the way for a welcome change of guard in Washington. At that time Iran was rocked by a clash of the top, where the rich Ayatollah Akbar Rafsanjani and his companion Mir Hossein Mousavi are exploiting the overwhelming election victory by secular Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to contest the regularity, and to give rise to manifestations of Piazza likely to destabilize the status quo. Ahmadinejad could count on the support of the Pasdaran and that of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, while on the other side, after a short period of impasse, including Ayatollah Mohammad Khatami decided to find out the cards and make public their support the Rafsanjani faction - Mousavi. Ahmadinejah enjoyed the support of the poorer segments of the population scattered all over the country, while his opponents were supported by the high middle class living in the suburbs of major cities in the Iranian elite. The outcome of the election (a difference of 11 million votes in favor of Ahmadinejad) was in itself obvious, since perfectly fits together with the data recorded during the previous vote, in which to receive a hard lesson from the former mayor of Tehran was directly Akbar Rafsanjani. All these clues confirming the high popularity of the Iranian people against Ahmadinejad's not enough to persuade the authoritative Western media, who were quick to to their positions held by Mousavi and to enhance the "authenticity" of the so-called "green wave" that was putting it upside down some parts of the Iranian capital. The heavy hand of the CIA Evins reckless use the rioters (who, among other things, protesting with signs written in English, bearing the slogan "Where is my vote?" So as not to confuse the message recipients. ..) did the usual social networking sites like Twitter and Facebook, especially in the exaltation of the false martyr Neda, and do not fall under the alleged atrocities committed by the Pasdaran better clarified. In any case, everything turned out to be a hoax, Ahmadinejad maintained his government post and "demonstrators" are among their ranks with his tail between his legs. Just a year after he returned to Chania media unleashed on the Iranian regime, staging a grotesque and pitiful funeral mass for the "martyr" and murderous faithless Sakineh, whose face was covered by a chador antiraniano slogans taken as a myriad of demonstrators in major squares Western , who evidently had not found something better to do than tearing his clothes in public for the fate of a dire Carneades any, without the slightest care of what was happening in the U.S., where a certain Teresa Lewis was conducted on death row after being recognized guilty of offenses similar to those committed by the elusive Sakineh. Outrage and solidarity, AC and variable geometry, for sentimental European and American protesters. Now, the thing you are doing much more serious, since the riots of the Maghreb are subject to an obvious manipulation by the U.S., who are trying in every way to trigger a chain reaction of riots involving the entire geographical area which extends from the southern shores of the Mediterranean to Central Asia. As expected, Iran was classified as a priority. On 14 February the opposition leader Mehdi Karroubi and Mir Hossein Mousavi have held a demonstration in Tehran in order to challenge the current government, which has prompted the usual Western media to talk about "chaos in Iran and the days counted could count on which the regime. Not a word about the fact that some "demonstrators" armed and opened fire on an ordinary passer-by, or on the eve of the event that the Iranian secret services have intercepted a phone call in which Mir Hossein Mousavi was talking with a member of the CIA demonstrations that would be held the following day or on the ground like mushrooms to be in television and radio stations financed by the U.S. and British governments. All trying desperately not exist similarities between Egypt and Iran, and to condemn without appeal to the bloody violence of the body of the Pasdaran, which was ascribed the murder without any evidence of passing, quickly turned into a "demonstrator" (Where he was a member of the guards "Basij"). For his part, Barack Obama has decided to play cards, expressing the hope that "Egypt is an example for the entire Middle East region," and that "the Iranians are also free to express themselves." So eloquent statements had not even heard the aftermath of the Iranian elections of 2009. The truth is that the fog that enveloped the Iranian affair are long dissolves, leaving the picture is sufficiently clear. The election of Obama nano perched on the shoulders of giant Zbigniew Brzezinski marked a tactical retreat from the extremist positions taken by the neoconservative warmongers. This Washington groped led to a sort of appeasement towards the Iranian president, offering favorable terms in return for giving up nuclear power and a true record of the change in energy policy, which wants as much as possible without ties to Moscow and Beijing. The Iranian president has unceremoniously turned down the offer, which is not too pleasing to his opponent Rafsanjani, who considers the radical opposition to the United States as a political move too reckless and utterly reckless. At that point the U.S. has decided to play the card outside interference. And in style Soros, or invading Iran with an army of NGOs and funding television and radio broadcasters on the lines of "Radio Free Europe", tanning throwing gasoline on the fire in the wake of the Iranian society existing internal friction (friction that relate to a large extent in the field of foreign policy choices made by Ahmadinejad, as shown above), so lay the groundwork for the formation of what would later become known as the "Green Wave", the principal in the attempted color revolution in 2009. In this light, the recent statements by Obama seem not merely tactical moves that are to join in the wider strategic plan to destabilize Iran, which until now has seen the U.S. ringed failure after another.

Kates Playground Uncensored Streaming

From Suez to Cairo

The shock wave triggered by movements of North Africa is clearly pushing the major hegemonic powers in the region to question the future to come, and to devise appropriate countermeasures to contain dangerous distortions of power relationships within the complex chessboard Mediterranean.

To be precise, some of the disruptions feared by them have already materialized in Lebanon, where Hezbollah has come out much stronger after they have been breaking partnership with the ambiguous double agent Saad Hariri (a political move that highlights the genius strategic movement headed by Nasrallah) and Jordan, where King Abdallah According moved ahead by demanding a change of government that might prove extremely indigestible allocated to tenants in the buildings in Washington and Tel Aviv. But if the U.S. is very clearly hiding behind a cryptic murmur made continuous leaps forward and symmetrical withdrawn (where direct-to unscrupulous and Barack Obama go along with the tentative standard positions taken by Hillary Clinton) trying to turn Machiavellian turned in their favor, Israel seems so bewildered and stunned that we sometimes fail to find a decent attitude to be taken before a situation so dangerous. In fact, the fall of Hosni Mubarak, adding the inversion au (and the public slapping of the Israeli leadership by Prime Minister Recep Erdogan is the aftermath of the "Lead Time" is the occasion of the attack on Freedom Flotilla) in key pro-Iranian made years ago by the historian turkish ally, Israel has relegated the most comprehensive regional isolation, and laid bare the paucity of strategic an entire political class brought up on bread and Zionism, able only to highlight the eyes of the allies "urgent need" to support the now unpresentable pharaoh Mubarak and to restart work on the construction of a "security barrier" along the border Egyptian. Another wall, after that of Jerusalem, with which Netanyahu and company are planning to put Israel away from the responsibilities that sooner or later have to decide to take. The same is true For European countries, that in addressing the issue have not gone beyond the issue of cheeps faint hope of a peaceful conclusion of the fighting in Egypt and condemned the "excesses" of the rioters. All except the U.S., if they are well entrenched behind their "walls" - physical or not - being very careful not to put a spoke in the wheel to the "democratic transfer" (which no one knows how it should be carried out) of power - advocated by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton - in Egypt. The last time that Egypt was in the middle of a genuine international dispute was during the Suez crisis of 1956, a historical parenthesis certainly not devoid of teachings. At the time Egypt was led by an able and astute colonel of the army provided the policy named Jamal Nasser, who, after having chased the fat King Farouk had immediately pledged to forge diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union at the same time hoping to be able to maintain cordial relations with the United States. The Gordian knot of his political contradictions was cut with a sharp blow by President Eisenhower, who punished his duplicity by denying the necessary funding for the construction of the Aswan Dam. The broad popular support it enjoyed, linked to its strategic vision of pan-Arab clear vocation, however, persuaded Nasser to play all out, or to declare the unilateral nationalization of the Suez Canal. It was a huge gamble policy with which the Egyptian president had first to collect the revenues needed for the construction of the Aswan Dam and the other to demonstrate to the world his political depth, saying with a single stroke of a pen full Egyptian sovereignty. The channel, however, was managed by a consortium of the British Empire which was the majority shareholder, and was itself considered a highway, a promontory from which the British government ruled the "Way of the Indies", a true melting-pot of world trade from which Britain could monitor communications with Europe, Asia and Africa. At the time, was the Conservative Prime Minister Anthony Eden, who considered Nasser a sort of Mussolini reviewed and corrected where necessary to address a hard lesson. As soon as he learned the news on the nationalization of the Suez Canal, he immediately instructed the military to devise a plan to invade Egypt, which would contain the channel under the aegis of the British and finally unseat the dangerous Jamal Nasser. He found in the French prime minister, the Socialist Guy Mollet, the shoulder was looking for. The motive of the latter, however, was primarily due to the fear that tolerating the audacity to Nasser Europe would have suffered from the same mistake made with Hitler at the Conference of Monaco. In essence, Mollet feared that merely sketch in front of the ruthlessness of Nasser would not have done nothing but provide it with valid reasons to increase its megalomania, and aim, therefore, continue to raise. A suicide tactics would quickly undermine the foundations of the French colonial domination on neighboring Algeria. Transferred to this the obsessions of the past, Eden and Mollet found fertile ground to forge a solid alliance Anglo - French antinasseriana key. It remained to find a third ally and a pretext to intervene. They found one and the other in Israel, whose leadership aspired to finally get rid of a fierce and powerful anti-Zionist as Nasser. The parties met at Sevres 22 to 24 October 1956, and put in place operational plans. Once that the Israeli army had launched a rapid and powerful preemptive attack of the armed forces stationed along the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula, France and Britain have warned that a ceasefire would be followed bipartisan - if Nasser had not stopped, as was expected - continues air strikes on Egyptian ports and airports over the military occupation of the channel. Everything went word for word according to plan. The Israeli army overthrew the Egyptian armed forces and penetrated the Sinai like a knife through butter, Nasser refused to stop fighting and Egypt was briefly brought to its knees by aviation Anglo - French, while the USSR, undertaken to deal with the insurgents in Budapest, he merely yelling sterile and not very credible threats of retaliation against invaders. And while the operation seemed to turn for the better, what happened to the European powers had not taken into account. Annoyed at not having been consulted by the allies, U.S. President Eisenhower decided to deal a blow to England, instructing the Treasury Department to sell pounds on New York Stock Exchange, scaling tanning rude British imperial aspirations and at the same time and ordered to France beware the dall'assecondare similar projects in future. Eden fell into a deep crisis and resigned a few months from happening, to shoulder the burden his successor, Harold MacMillan to rebuild the country, while Nasser remained firmly in place with the final nationalization of the Suez Canal and an enormous international prestige gained in his pocket. Within a few months, Britain was forced to abandon their dreams of glory in its entirety to satisfy those of the United States, the French fell to deal with the Algerian nationalism and call a "Father of the Nation" of farsightedness and such as Charles De Gaulle airport to ferry the country permanently outside dell'anacronistica colonial perspective, as Israel rules with greater precision the balance of power with the neighborhood. For their part, the United States were limited to take over the imperial legacy left them by the British, and to roughly everything that had been banned by England. Eden and Mollet read the reality with the retrograde and myopic lens of the past, and did not know what the signs of the change of era. This compromise for decades, the presence Anglo - French or in its limited however, and quite a bit, the ability of influenza. Today, as then there is the urgency to acquire the best tools to interpret what is happening in Egypt and all its neighbors. However, what is visible is the massive Israeli inadequacy, his inability to understand the inevitability of making a radical overhaul of all its positions in the region that is matched by all'avvilente European inconsistency, his lack of a comprehensive political project independent of Washington. Just as Israel must now realize that the United States are no longer the all-powerful masters of the world - always ready to rush to their aid - and that the walls can not protect it more than they have done with the whites of South Africa (and to seize the bandwagon to act accordingly), so European countries should reflect on the current geopolitics, he sees a slow but steady decline in the U.S., and again to reconsider its order of priorities. The difference is that in dealing with the Suez crisis were unable to come to terms with its decline, but now do not know how to deal with the U.S.. O (as is more likely) do not want. For decades, in fact, no European country has been able to influence the trend of the major international events (more or less by Scott Suez onwards), if not strictly in the context of collective action led by the United States. Some of these countries, like France and Germany, have managed to limit to pursue their narrow garden plots, where they were allocated specific resources to be exploited or older remnants, relics of the "good old days gone by." There are still the instruments of foreign policy - diplomacy and armies, for example - but are merely ornamental old memorabilia to show off with permission from Washington. It is therefore crumbs and nothing more. Because the truth is that in all these years have been woven rave in front of a supposedly "united Europe", but in practice the powers of the Old Continent have done nothing but look askance at, each concerned to compete effectively with other, giving priority to national interests across continents. And this division, for the maintenance of which has been specially created an assembly of bureaucrats and businessmen the epitome (the "EU") has been very instrumental in power dominated. However, many European nations did in fact have many convergent interests, and are backed by a strong community of ambitions and cultural orientations. The fact that these convergences and commonalities are not exploited and that still, in dealing with special events such as the movements of North Africa, all answering the European expect that there Fiondini first to the U.S. - where, said en passant, the Mediterranean is a few miles to kilometers , unlike that for us - and then contend for the leftovers courtesy such as "loyalty bonus" is a very reliable indicator of the degree of corruption inside the nomenklatura of the individual states, so that they are only acting to confirm the real and substantial reasons for their success and indicate who are the direct beneficiaries of their work. It 's very likely that during the Suez crisis of Eden and Mollet acted in good faith, believe to pursue interests of their countries, while in this congregation of businessmen is frankly hard to give the benefit of the doubt.

Examples Of A Alpha Ka

A new model and the sea in winter




I'm back with a new model. Baby It's Cold Outside is a scarf designed for the most sensitive to cold, because it is buttoned and adheres well to the neck, without running too much air, but especially for those who want a quick projects to do, but not too boring, with the braid and short rows. Perfect for getting comfortable with these techniques in a non-traumatic, due to the coarse yarn and easy to work, is also a great last minute gift, because you end up in a few hours. The pattern name is the title of a song, a classic Frank Loesser, starring among others, by Dean Martin, Ella Fitzgerald, Ray Charles, Dionne Warwick.

What more do you want?

I would like another beautiful day like the one pictured, to go to dig with their paws on rocky shore in the wet ceerca colored glasses. I will stop here, because I would like other things more complicated, so I leave you the link to last post the friend CIAM

The pattern is in testing and will be available soon. The yarn is Puno1 of Filitaly Lab (info)

Go Fight Win Cheer Sayings

Risks and Opportunities

to the turmoil that for months and months, shaking the Italian political scene, he went to join the general turmoil in the Arab world triggered by movements in Tunisia, which have acted as a detonator of the complex powder keg in the Middle East and North Africa (which involves all the Arab countries ranging from Morocco to Pakistan) in constant danger of explosion.

After the failures of almost every color revolutions - with the consolation Georgian - try (Iran) and only in principle go in port (Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan), the United States are now celebrate the supposed "desire for democracy" of the Tunisian people, who took to the streets purports to give rise to revolt eloquently dubbed by the U.S. press as "Jasmine Revolution", a term that refers ominously to actual riots instigated by Washington in the watchmaking countries that once formed part of the Soviet Union (especially), in which GM financed by the usual "philanthropists" to turn (Soros in particular) and political factions closely linked to the centers of power in the U.S., in apparent convergence of interests, have joined forces to throw in a single cauldron equiparante real reasons del'esistente popular discontent and false or vastly inflated in this explosive concoction to heighten the tension to breaking point, which should have culminated in the overthrow of the orders made unwelcome in Washington. However, the detonator of the revolution of Tunisia does not seem to be craving that was not "democratic" as indicated by the press made in USA (as always reduces everything to an event of very organic to their own interests), but the exponential growth of prices for basic necessities - such as bread, milk and other foods - due to the voracity of the "locusts" that are literally destroying the financial world production (brushing industries pushed foot), thus rocketing the prices of the goods mentioned above, and the recklessness of the crack linked to the president just kicked, Ben Ali, who after hearing the saber-rattling, it was decided to direct that the prices were tiered. This did not do much to appease the popular fury, which has also cut down on the Tunisian government, urging Ben Ali to an ignominious flight. This has given rise to an ill-concealed relief to the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who despite his loquacity was proverbial "strangely" quietened the obvious economic motives of the riot to release the usual corny public statements peppered with humanitarian rhetoric, praising the " popular sovereignty "of desirable and that the" thirst for democracy "Tunisia is promptly subsided. The reason that led her to focus on that workhorse explains very clearly the lively Webster Tarpley, who stresses that "The economic turmoil in the course represents a real problem for the imperialists in Washington, as the guidelines State Department tend to define human rights exclusively in political and religious terms, never as a matter of economic or social rights. price controls, wage policies, unemployment allowance, tools of welfare, right to health, housing policies, rights trade union control over banks, tariffs and other protectionist instruments to national self-defense has no place in the repeated mantra from Washington. " First mystery (Pulcinella) revealed. The exaltation of certain attitudes that Ben Ali would take nabob, operated by the usual clockwork cablegrams of Wikileaks and amplified by certain publications, however, recalls very closely the smear campaign mounted, long ago, the Georgian President Edouard Shevardnadze from several German newspapers, which, accusing him of having bought a luxury villa in the town of Baden Baden with taxpayers' money, we hope to put in full light the corruption that snaked inside his government. The news turned out to have been invented from scratch, but only after Shevardnadze was forced to leave his post to his successor, Mikheil Saakashvili, during the only color revolution successful, the so-called "Rose". The fact also that Hillary Clinton has called on companies like Google to stop adapt to the requirements of complaint submitted by governments, "tyrannical", to protect the so-called "free network" in reference to the Tunisian government's decision to obscure the Internet (over dyeing of ridicule) is easily interpreted as yet another tribute to social networks like Facebook and Twitter, the subversive potential of which have been widely demonstrated during the most colossal failure "colored", that of the so-called "green wave" in Iran. However, the revolt of Tunisia seems to be driven by solid and understandable reasons, which must be recognized a respectable degree of authenticity. So that appears to confer a great deal of credibility to the argument that the U.S. is really trying in every way to take control of the riot, to pull on their side so that it flows from the effects welcome to mob installed strategists in the Pentagon and the Department of State. They WOULD BE and then trying to channel the popular wave for right conduct, to exploit the popular discontent that exists in many countries in Africa and Asia to trigger a domino effect of revolutions (colored or not) along the lines of the Tunisian model, a vortex that sucks in their coils so unpopular presidents in Washington as Gaddafi in Libya and Assad (and race) in Syria as faithful gerontocrat atlantism but made inadequate by the recent geopolitical dynamics as (precisely) Ben Ali in Tunisia and Mubarak in Egypt. In Egypt there is an ongoing insurgency that many have assimilated to that of Tunisia, but the common points of contact does not seem many. In Egypt (despite the attention that the Western press is devoting to El Baradei) in Tunisia as the rebels do not appear to have barricaded themselves behind the figure of a single leader, but the first country has a strong team like the Muslim Brotherhood which there is no track in the political landscape of the second. Tunisia has also turned against a political class that pro-Western course, but for purely economic reasons, or against a political class in power for two decades, devoted to the maintenance of their specific interests and indifferent to the continuing deterioration of living conditions of the population. The reasons that led insurgency seem Egyptian, relating mostly to three decades of subjugation of Mubarak atlantism more extreme, the policy is completely bound to the wishes of Washington and Tel Aviv and, therefore, highly repressive towards religious factions (as, precisely, the Muslim Brotherhood) against Israel and solidarity with the Arab neighbors. The importance that the Israeli government recognizes as an ally Mubarak is seen inter alia from the fact that the same Israeli press recently given prominence to the news that the Israeli foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman would have had that the Israeli ambassadors in Europe, Russia and the U.S. did this to the countries concerned of the urgency of supporting the Mubarak regime. The U.S., meanwhile, did not hide some concern for what is happening in Egypt, although not say too much as their allies in Tel Aviv. Barack Obama has been limited to a mere stigmatize, in a very cryptic, "excesses" of the crowd (which did not report the story in Tunisia) and to hope for a normal transition to democracy ". In fact, the situation of Tunisia, in which there is functional chaotic instability in Washington, much less cause for concern in the White House than the Egyptian, who sees a strong faction allegedly disposed towards the West or the Muslim Brotherhood, in a favorable position compared to all others in the race to succeed Mubarak exile. It 's probably what was responsible for the reverence with which Westerners are treating the seeds - Carneades El Baradei, who most likely will enjoy their full support, particularly in the election, thanks to the note "flexibility" (or "control") to its "democratic practice." But destabilization might be overwhelming (so would hope the U.S., according to this reading), and involve openly hostile countries such as Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and to ensure that dangerous factions like Hezbollah forces are in the favor of candidates far more soft and "reasonable", or as decadent as the billionaire Hariri intertwined with real Saudis, historic allies of the USA. In general, however, it is possible that the turbulence is throwing general restlessness many African and Asian governments are instrumental (but not that he falls) to the project of balkanization weblog act to undermine U.S. interests at the foundation of the great rival powers, namely Iran, Russia and China, who are scoring the winning shots in the entire area affected by the turbulent phenomenon. The appeasement of the radical Turkey in respect of the three powers mentioned has made it more urgent imperative to isolate Iran, to harm the business of gold that China is closing with many African countries and to limit the reach of Gazprom, the armed wing with which Putin is tightening in several European countries embrace the Russian energy. The destabilization of Pakistan, especially after its rapprochement with Islamabad to Beijing and involving them in discussions aimed to involve Gazprom in the construction of gas pipeline with Iran, proceeds continuously. Ambitious South Stream project, with which Putin has managed to put in close contact (with all the consequences that it entails) diplomats of several countries in Europe and Asia, the U.S. and Brussels bureaucrats have tried to respond with the utopian Nabucco pipeline, designed to ease the natural interdependence between Europe and Russia. A few days ago has matured to the secession of southern Sudan - a country with which China has long maintained close commercial and diplomatic ties - in the context of a long civil war (although completely different in nature than in Tunisia or Egypt) chock-full of interference external. These operations all registrable in the U.S. strategic plan. These recent turmoil does not seem to fruit of that tree, and it would be wrong to assimilate the other. However, countries affected by the riots would do well to remain vigilant about upcoming developments, and to carefully manage this situation, which on the one hand gives them leeway imagined for gerontocrat who had remained in place thanks to decades of intrigues, favors and backroom deals, but which sees them at the same time extremely exposed and vulnerable. If they could bring together the mutual interests may find the strength needed to make a U-turn, perhaps reclaiming the control of their resources without incurring the same fate of the old Persian statesman Mossadeq, sacrificial lamb of imperialism. Meanwhile, the environment may stem from parasites and subservient to the powers that be, as Hezbollah is doing, and put a price control on basic necessities, as they did at the time the revolutionaries French. Once established these constraints are likely to adopt an economic policy geared towards protectionism and to stimulate the optimization of its domestic production on a truly independent from other countries. A critical reading of the thought of Friedrich List, as well as to dispose Ruollah his time Ayatollah Khomeini Iran after the Islamic Revolution, which culminated with the expulsion of his enslaved as a parasite on the Shah Reza Pahlavi. Certainly will not be easy to govern the chaos of today, but as always correspond to the risks and opportunities and countries such as Tunisia and Egypt (and others, of course) could be seized to shake off their torpor atavistic, which he had nailed to decades in a subordinate position to define very limited would be an understatement.

Can My Wife Get Pregnant If She's Clipped

Breaking Point

The economic crisis culminated in recent years has attracted the praise of reckless hordes polychromatic composed of fools and backward "analysts" of yesteryear, who sang in unison their "hosanna" in the face imminent, the alleged "collapse of the system", where there was a disruption of all internal to capitalism, which has assumed such as to fully reflect the conflict that rules the great economic game, in which many actors are primary finding in opposition to one another, all against all (or a few against many, or few against few) to contend for supremacy in shots financial move frequently bedded below the waist, parallel with the repercussions they inexorably slow to take on a variety of fabrics and production (consequently) in domestic policy.

This reading of the reality of imperialism refers explicitly to the concept developed by Lenin on the eve of the Great War, which focused broadly on analysis of the competitive battle, taking place at the turn of the century, between the various world powers involved in the redesign balance of power within the world market. The clash between the horizontal power in question is developed in stages uncertain, produced two world wars and numerous conflicts over circumscribed, and led to the establishment of a bipolar world order, whose specific constraints, with its territorial divisions into "competence areas" were established at Yalta in 1945. Since then, members of the Communist bloc countries have been limited to faithfully implement the directives from the Kremlin, without taking the trouble, because there was not a need to develop an alternative strategic thinking, which put them away from an improbable - but, as you know, tragically plausible - the capitulation of the parent. It 'should instead set up a different speech to the Western powers, whose dependence on the U.S. has still obliged to optimize their skills and capabilities, in order to effectively sustain competition in markets. Distorting competition at the root by U.S. military power - that the White House could theoretically have used the allied rivals (oxymoron that returns in the full sense of reality) for non-purely "defensive" - \u200b\u200bbut the U.S. were never forced to use to assert their own success. The American production system turns out to be successful for reasons directly related to the strategic vision in which its maneuvers decided to build its own business model. Fordism had persuaded many observers that it was necessary to achieve prosperity in the U.S. largely focus on these areas affected by the phenomenon, namely the automotive and engineering industry. Specifically, this misunderstanding of economic reality drove first-rate countries such as Italy, Germany and Japan to lavish huge efforts to innovate the acts already bloated automobile sector, firmly convinced that occurring in that sector more competitive, and penetrating the market massively in the U.S. have drastically reduced the economic margin that separated them from Washington. On this gambling economy, the political classes that supported these nations came to adapt the whole political system, promoting a kind of social Keynesianism by which the states to shoulder a large part of the costs required to support expansion (or, as in Italy, survival) of these areas. The U.S. did not move a finger and took advantage of the situation to focus on many other policy areas, including emerging technologies, which still have an unquestionable superiority. The move proved successful in the light of the fact that the automobile sector was very close to saturation, and that, far from pulling any kind of development, could only produce stagnation in the countries that had bet on it. On the eastern front, the fall of the Soviet Union literally buried countries orphans of that as a veritable avalanche of huge inadequacies - due to the inability to develop winning strategies indicated earlier - which forced them (often in taxation and an overdue welcome) to cut the umbilical cord that tied them to go to Moscow en masse under the "wing" of NATO. The new world order based on the absolute supremacy of the United States completely redesigned the balance of power inside the globe, clearly tipping the scales on the side of Washington. Almost every country in the world had become, with "good" (blackmail, threats) or the "bad" (aggression, war and commercial), "allies" of the United States, who, not having to answer for their actions to any equal counterpart, did not bother too much to resort to "deterrence" economic and military to impose its will. This bad habit lasted for little more than a decade, since that is when the U.S. began to falter in spite of the emergence or re-emergence of several regional powers that are burning up the steps towards the goal, which is to break down the (declining) U.S. dominance. After years of quiet slumber, the Leninist analysis of imperialism is back just as loudly and forcefully to the fore. The exuberant growth of the emerging powers is colliding with the interests of those powers that are long, and did not intend to lose all their privileges. Everywhere in Europe is a clash between fierce large sections of the population (those located at the base), for which the belt is tightening more and more, especially with regard to the welfare and (soon) health, with those businesses located at the summit, claiming that tax less burdensome to not lose ground to those Americans and those related to emerging countries. The European powers, far from being compact, they are often divided by conflicting interests, as they are nailed to the inadequacy of gerontocrat who lead them, aged in the shadow of the Berlin Wall and totally without the means to produce a comprehensive strategic thinking adequate time in which we live. Some of them are bent as the sole wears logic Atlantic, while many others (the so-called "Left") are nothing but mere mouthpiece of the sectors parasitic intertwined in Washington, which follow the guidelines verbatim. The Italian example is very eloquent in this regard. A twenty-year duration of single combat staged by the theater of politics, where so-called "right" and so-called "left" will have to market election pouring mud on each other, spending on flood of words and energy on trivial matters extremely rearguard battles daughters of ideologies sclerotizzatisi few decades ago. No one who points the finger at the king was naked, and they undertake to break the intolerable inertia that has lasted too long, in which the finance subject to the powers that be continue to keep international life in those areas capitalist strongly anchored to the engineering / automotive regularly short of capital, the competition that much prefer the welfare system (such as Fiat) parasitic so dear to the romantics Keynesian (and some left unions tout court), who applaud public subsidies - are considered "necessary" - promptly granted, and to keep such verminous Italian political class has wielded the ax tax on domestic production base, composed mainly by self-employed. The chatter around the labor market continues to hold the counter, with the oligarchs who demand compelling and indisputable disposals and pension insurance to act as a counterbalance the romantic mentioned above, that pontificating on the stability of full-time work carefully avoiding to deal with what is there. Is not absolutely clear that the writer's intention to bring grist to the mill of the oligarchies, but to set a serious discussion on a topic of such great importance, in dealing with the wreckage of which almost all the so-called "left" alternative or extreme have turned their backs on reality merely rant sull'inaccettabilità of job insecurity, tanning persuaded to proclaim their total alienation from "evil." In Russia, Vladimir Putin has long taken measures which would give rise to the discomfort of the human category just described, that the scandal has unanimously shouted "reactionary." In reality, Putin has preferred to tighten the belt with respect to allocate more funds for social spending aimed at stimulating Russia's resurgence, which was duly verified and incontrovertibly thanks all'intelligentissimo role saddled by Putin to the state energy company Gazprom. In Italy however the debate turns on completely different topics, ranging dall'ignobile draft fragment ENI - in compliance with the directives issued by the Brussels bureaucrats, the epitome - so as to break the "sad and anti-liberal" monopoly and make it attractive to some giant alien to the downsizing of Finmeccanica imposed desk after work dirty work from the usual judiciary acting in AC and variable geometry, the usual "joyous war machine" of occhettiana memory. No one who stresses the urgency to make a radical university reform, stating presessantottini education levels, to allocate funds to promote research, to exploit the impending polycentrism to free themselves from the subordination of the Atlantic, and weave plots diplomatic vocation clear Machiavellian, that is designed to use its leading companies to close large contracts (as he recently did, albeit quietly, Finmeccanica) with key strategic countries (Russia, Iran and Turkey) in order to trigger an intensification of relations capable of shifting large benefits for all parties involved. At present there are no forces in Italy nor sufficiently cohesive and structured political factions involved to support them, but only a chaotic and apocalyptic cauldron in which the parasites stand out (by far) numerically on innovators, as opposed to what may well enjoy the ' unconditional support of big business and international legitimacy without any minions seated in Brussels. Same thing, apart from sporadic positions taken by Germany, which is roughly the rest of Europe, plagued by the same ills that afflict the "beautiful country", which is still a distinction in terms of failure and duplicity of its representatives. The Italian political class and many of its financial and business circles have reached the point of no return, a level of corruption and verminosità that make difficult to envisage any place inside the national charity. Which is why it is good to be on the alert, and reflect more carefully on that famous passage in which Lenin pointed out that "A revolution without firing squads do not have reason to be." And to draw the necessary conclusions.

Linsey Dawn 16 Years Old

Sold out!


you remember the bears of the Sun and Sun Bear Collection, the project in collaboration with Ursa Freedom Project and the Bornean Sun Bear Conservation Centre? After months of knitting bears, e-mail from Jeanette McDermott, Maren Dallman and me, wild promotion, labels to be written (in English, ouch!), wrap and travel packages to the post office, not only for me but also for the two girls mentioned above, we can finally say it was a success.
I decided to write this post for two reasons. The first is transparency: it is not fair to ask to contribute to a project and then disappear with no accountability to anyone.

I just got a message from Jeanette that tells me:
We sold all 18 bears for a total of $ 485 plus $ 90 delivery charge that Jeanette, Maren and I have donated to the Centre were collected A total of $ 575.
are not a lot of money, but it is much more than I could give a personal gift, not to mention the satisfaction of knowing that my bears are around the world.

The second is the desire to give a little testimony. I heard from Jeanette Maren and other people of the Freedom Project Network Ursa came forward to propose other projects related to their craft or artistic ability to fund initiatives in favor of bears around the world. How I was inspired by the work of Elena Sanna, a painter friend who sold his paintings to fund Animals Asia Foundation (an association that protects the bears of the Moon, worked on farms and bile recovers to give them a new life), someone else will pick up a witness and this gives me a bit 'optimism.

Now I greet you, I end up in my lair to gloat and make myself a slice of bread with blueberry jam to celebrate.

Thank you very much and felt ursino who participated, those who have supported the initiative with just a comment encouraging to those who bought the bears (treat them well, it was difficult to part with it!) And all the friends of Ursa Freedom Project!