Stalin, convinced he had caught in a kind of Jewish cultural tilt in favor of socialism, as well as irreducible hostility to the occupying British, felt that the project aimed at supporting the creation of the Zionist entity in the heart of the Levant would be guaranteed a role in the implementation of the latter, get rid of the last residues imperialist British, and win the favor of political leadership that would have established a short in the buildings of Tel Aviv. A plausible and predictable rebelliousness of the Arab population affected by the partition plan would have accelerated even projects of Stalin, he would immediately exploited properly has become the excuse to invest in the Red Army of starvation role of the armed wing of the United Nations. In this way the Soviet Union would have had the opportunity to exploit a situation of great benefit to trigger propaganda activities and to weave plots to balance the diplomatic hegemony in the Atlantic and Mediterranean Levantine, which was sustained on the fifth column of Iran ( governed by Reza Pahlavi) and Turkey. While many Israeli men of state, David Ben Gurion to Golda Meir, have openly acknowledged the central role that the Soviet Union took much in the determination of the birth of Israel in maintaining its own survival (a huge quantity of arms was granted to Israel through Czechoslovakia on the eve of the war of 1948), Tel Aviv, soon freed from the bonds that bound her to Moscow. For his part, Stalin became progressively into account the fact that Israel was developing a network of alliances able to relate Soviet Zionists, Israelis and Americans, in a community of transnational interests of all harmful to the Soviet Union. Everything brought about a gradual disintegration of relations, which culminated in failure in early 1953, when the Soviet embassy in Tel Aviv exploded as a result of a terrorist attack in the preparation of which had involved several senior Israeli military leaders. The Israeli affair was probably one of the most glaring strategic errors committed by Stalin during his long career as a statesman, a real boomerang that sort fact diametrically opposed to those who had set the mustachioed Georgian. The U.S. interest for Israel, essentially dictated by the location where it is located and dall'oberante weight that is able to exercise the so-called "Israel lobby" in Congress and on government that happen from time to time, and the resulting strengthened the Washington - Tel Aviv has guaranteed to cover the Zionist military and political support needed to implement the well-known practice, extremely aggressive towards the neighborhood, and created a huge uproar among the Arab people who in turn put in place a permanent state of tension throughout the Middle East. Ever since the Suez crisis of 1956, which resolved with the actual departure from the scene by the imperialist powers under French and British - whose respective hegemonic (control of the canal, among others) were drastically downsized U.S. intervention - there was so understand the importance that the U.S. attributed to Israel, which claims and obtained an assurance that Washington would support any action in any case, from Tel Aviv to its "right of self-defense" in case of renewal of the naval blockade of the Straits of Tiran or take back the incursions of the Palestinian paramilitary group "Fedayn" . From that moment on, the United States have made increasing efforts to ensure full support to Israel, whose ambiguous and instrumental use of the concept of "security" will be a regular, Machiavelli used to legitimize all kinds of sorts. The Palestinian issue and then enrolled in the light of the facts, the ranks of geopolitical priorities that U.S. administrations have repeatedly found to manage. The U.S. has in fact supported right in the various phases of imperialism Israeli ethnic cleansing of Palestinians (so minutely described by Ilan Pappe, Israeli scholar attached to the current revisionist "new historians") colonial expansion, which reached its peak at the June 5 1967, the day that broke the "Six Day War." It was a war generally, and also incorrect and dishonest by many historians as a defensive Zionists, where Israel was to implement a repeated series of provocations in order to stimulate the naive surrounding Arab countries - Syria and Egypt, EU allies Soviet Union - to enter into a conflict from which they could not help but go out with broken bones and hundreds of miles of territory occupied by the Israeli army. For the rest of the "Cold War" Washington axis - Tel Aviv has not suffered any cracking, as is normal to happen in a bipolar geopolitical order, as a rule, the rigidity of the blocks causes the remain stable and permanent alliances, the threats are serious but predictable, and the UN, placed between two fires of almost equal power, ineffective and therefore harmless. This has meant that the forty-year "peace process" arbitration by the United States has only served to aggravate the living conditions of the Palestinians and Israel to ensure that immunity is necessary to ensure that moved at will and without hindrance in that particular complex scenario. The disintegration of the Soviet Union and the establishment of a unipolar world order and single-center then led to the U.S. embroiled in three separate wars (Iraq, Afghanistan, Iraq 2) in the Near East, committed to a strategy to fragment the whole area into zones separated by fault lines that theoretically would have followed the compositions / ethnic and sectarian divisions. A geopolitics of chaos aimed at creating a constellation of buffer states, ranging from Africa to the Mediterranean to Central Asia, around the resurgent Russian power, ruled by an ambitious, far-sighted strategist and unflappable as Vladimir Putin. In compliance with this strategy, the Palestinians would have had to settle for a narrow "Bantustans" contiguous to Israel, deprived of drinking water and in which they could enjoy their full sovereignty. A prospect that the discredited Abu Mazen, who barely speaks for itself, it seemed willing to accept, in the context of the grotesque "dialogue," sponsored by Barack Obama, Benjamin Netanyahu. Two states for two peoples, therefore, in which the Palestinians expelled from the West Bank would have to flow into the ground in a tiny, impoverished territory, while the Israelis would have been to incorporate much of the resource-rich territories occupied in 1967. Hamas, legitimate representative of the Palestinian people settled along the battered Gaza Strip, did not bend to these conditions and continues to claim the right to establish a loyal to the Palestine partition plan adopted by the UN. Also to isolate Hamas finally, Israel has supported (and maybe more) unconditionally and enthusiastically the aggression on Iraq in 2003, in order to remove the most proud supporter of the Palestinian resistance. However, the legacy of Saddam Hussein was quickly picked up by the Shiite front, embodied by Iran, Syria and the powerful Lebanese movement Hezbollah, which, in tandem with the slow but steady decline in the U.S. and the parallel rise of powers like China and, of course , Russia, has forced Israel to appease their ambitions and look around for new alliances. For its part, Turkey, another emerging power, made the grim Israeli incursion at the end of December 2008, known as "Lead Time" as an excuse to radically review its position in the area. Prime Minister Recep Erdogan, assisted dall'abilissimo Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, has publicly maligned the operation, digging a furrow made that much more profound during the Israeli aggression on the "Freedom Flotilla", when he came to claim the undisputed apology from Netanyahu, on pain of breaking off diplomatic relations. In fact Turkey is pursuing a foreign policy strongly neglect Europe and the U.S. historic ally, burying the hatchet with the surrounding Arab countries with its historic enemy, Russia, Erdogan has been placed in a position to leverage on its geographic position to serve as a crossroads of many projects (such as "South Stream") with a clear vocation Eurasian. Being the good-neighborly relations fundamental to advocate a policy of so broad, Turkey has begun to look to Israel as a threat capable, with his aggression, undermine the peaceful coexistence. Hence, the choice of looking east toward Russia, Mongolia, China and Iran, and south - west, towards the emerging countries in indiolatina. And many countries have their own from that area of \u200b\u200bthe world - that Venezuela, Cuba, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Uruguay, Argentina, Ecuador, Bolivia and Brazil - the first to recognize the Palestinian state within the borders established in 1967, presumably annoyed by the continuous and repeated ambiguity Netanyahu - who agrees to sit at the bargaining table by refusing to start in responding to the minimum prerequisite, which is to stop building settlements in the territories illegally occupied - and willing to hear their voices high. To indiolatini was then added to Russia recently, but was limited to the mouth of President Dmitri Medvedev, to recognize the Palestinians' right to have their own state with a East Jerusalem is the capital of Russia then plug it back in the Levant in the opposite way to what Stalin did, or stretching out a hand to the Palestinians, but the formula by which this expansion has been made known links to a more serious underlying problem. Recognizing political legitimacy to a future Palestinian state but did not mention any border within which it should be born, Moscow could, consequently, to endorse the project of "two states for two peoples" described above, along the lines of American neoconservatives. However, the policy advocated in recent years by multi Vladimir Putin gives very little credence to this hypothesis. Also thanks to the extensive network of alliances woven by the Kremlin is unlikely Putin and Medvedev who choose to turn our backs on countries with which it has in place an effective and beneficial relaxation of relations, such as Iran and Turkey, to meet the sinister Zionist imperialism. The very fact that Russia has received Khaled Mashaal, one of the leaders of Hamas, with the honors normally reserved for heads of state, says a lot about the spirit behind this award. For its part, Israel does not hide its concern, knowing that Russia's move could hypothetically serve as an example that many countries, in a sort of chain reaction, could suddenly decide to emulate. E 'likely that Israel will decide, willy-nilly (at least in the long term), to exit the bell jar which is autosegregato several decades to finally dive into the reality, which will bring its political leaders to give up several claims as to maintain the Jewish character of the population or "bantustanizzare" Palestinians in areas that are not very dissimilar from reserves in which the Yankees locked indigenous peoples in India. The creation of a single state that would guarantee equal interfaith and peaceful coexistence between Arabs and Jews seems the only sensible, but hardly feasible. We'll see if the emerging powers that are only recently seeing the spotlight will to prevail, with the stick or the carrot, the spirit of solidarity on the rivalry intestine, and the basis for resolving an issue as thorny as the Palestinian one, which many of the failures are all, or nearly, which share responsibility (to varying degrees).
0 comments:
Post a Comment